Farmers’ markets help Richmond rank as #18 fittest city in United States

Posted at 12:58 PM, May 19, 2015
and last updated 2015-05-19 12:58:42-04

RICHMOND, Va. — The metro-Richmond area has ranked the #20 fittest city in the United States, according to a recent report released by the American College of Sports Medicine. Richmond has ranked in the top 20 since 2009, partly on the strength of its growing farmers’ market scene.

Richmond’s strengths include “a high number of farmers’ markets per resident, a high number of recreational facilities per resident including recreation centers, swimming pools and tennis courts, and a low death rate for diabetes,” the report indicated.


Researchers highlighted those four areas as Richmond’s most improved since 2009:

  • The number of farmers’ markets per 1,000,000 increased from 6.6 to 28.4.
  • The death rate per 100,000 for diabetes decreased from 25.7 to 10.7.
  • The percent of days when mental health was not good decreased from 38.6% to 29.9%.
  • The death rate per 100,000 for cardiovascular disease decreased from 226.8 to 188.0.

The news was not all great for metro-Richmond. The region still ranks high for obesity and asthma and low in terms of money spent on parks and recreation.

Capture 02

Richmond ranked just ahead of Baltimore (#19) and just behind Chicago (#17) on the list. Virginia Beach ranked #15. The study found the more pedestrian-friendly the city, the healthier its residents.

The nation’s capital has topped the list a second year in a row as the “Nation’s Fittest City.” Minneapolis-St. Paul and San Diego were strong contenders, rounding out the top three spots. Indianapolis, known for its car racing, finished last in the heat, as the nation’s least fit city, with Memphis and Oklahoma City close behind.

Leading experts in the field of sports medicine and exercise science say personal and environmental factors contribute to the rankings.

“The American Fitness Index is two things: a measure of how healthy a metro area is today, and a call to action for urban and suburban leaders to design infrastructures that promote active lifestyles and lead to positive health outcomes,” said Walter R. Thompson, chairman of the American Fitness Index Advisory Board and professor of kinesiology and heath at Georgia State University. “Our goal is to provide communities and residents with resources that help them assess, respond and achieve a better, healthier life.”

Cities continuously use the data provided by the American Fitness Index report to make changes in their policies and urban planning. St. Louis had one of the biggest gains this year, jumping from No. 41 on the list in 2014 to No. 30, and much of its success has been attributed to an increase in residential recreational facilities, city parks and farmers’ markets, study experts say. Oklahoma City, which ranked last in 2012, improved this year after the mayor launched a “This City is Going on a Diet” campaign, in which residents reached a goal of losing a collective 1 million pounds last month.

Access to public parks was a new measure factored into this year’s rankings. Experts involved in the study say the infrastructure of a city and variety of outdoor activity options have a direct correlation to the overall health of a city.

“How walkable is your city?” asked Thompson. “In Washington, D.C., 95% of the population live within a 10-minute walk to a park,” he said. In Indianapolis it’s only 31%. “Clearly the environmental indicators in D.C. would lend themselves more towards supporting people who want to be physically active and healthy,” he added.

“When it comes to fitness, there’s not a one-size-fits-all system,” said Brenda Rahe, a certified personal trainer, wellness coach and professional bodybuilder. “If you live in a city which makes it hard to walk or get to a gym, you can still get active, you just have to look for creative ways. There are tons of exercises, online training programs and coaches that you tap into from home.”

The study used publicly available data from federal reports to generate the personal health indicator and community/environmental health indicator scores.

Also evident from the analysis, experts say, is that people across the country are eating less fruit. The cities that ranked the lowest in fruit and vegetable consumption also had the lowest number of farmers’ markets per capita.

Experts say this study is a step toward improving the health of the United States. “It’s the choices and little changes we can make in our lives each and every day that can have the biggest impact,” Thompson said.